Zuckerberg unconvincingly feigns ignorance of data-sucking VPN scandal – TechCrunch

Zuckerberg unconvincingly feigns ignorance of data-sucking VPN scandal – TechCrunch


Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg In the wake of last year’s major controversy, today’s House of Representatives hearing turned out to be completely untrue, in which his company paid teens to use a VPN app that allowed them to use the Internet. Detailed statistics were reported. Although he did not lie directly about it, his answers were ridiculous and misleading. Only then can an immediate explanation be guaranteed.

Republican Hank Johnson (D-GA) was asking Zuckerberg to confirm last year’s series events. Provide a security service.

Shortly afterwards, Facebook quietly began paying people – 18 percent of them teenagers – to install the “Facebook Research” app, which worked under a different name, similar to Onavo. Tech Glass reported it and Apple issued the ban before the end of the day. Facebook has claimed that it was removed voluntarily, but this has not been proven true.

Correspondent Johnson questioned Zuckerberg on these letters, and the latter repeatedly expressed familiarity and ignorance of the matter.

Johnson: When it became common knowledge that Facebook was using Owens for digital surveillance, your company removed it from Apple’s App Store, isn’t that true?

Zuckerberg: Congressman, I’m not sure I’ll give it that feature.

JohnsonI mean, Onao was removed from the App Store, isn’t that true?

Zuckerberg: Congressman, after changing Apple’s policies on VPN apps, we took the app out.

Johnson: And this was due to the use of monitoring tools.

Zuckerberg: Congressman, I do not believe that the policy was stated in this way or that it has the right features; [The policies are explained below.]

Johnson: Let me ask you this question, after booting out Onavo from the App Store, you turned to other monitoring tools, like the Facebook Research app, right?

ZuckerbergCongressmen: In general, yes, we are a wide variety

JohnsonIsn’t it true, Mr. Zuckerberg, that Facebook paid teenagers to sell their privacy by installing the Facebook Research app?

ZuckerbergCongressman, I’m not aware of this, but I think it’s a common practice for companies to do different surveys and find out how people are using different products and what their preferences are.

Johnson: Facebook Research App Taken Out Of App Store, Isn’t That True?

ZuckerbergCongressman, I’m not aware of that.

Image Credit: YouTube

Of course, the idea that Zuckerberg was unaware of the events that made headlines, rejected Facebook’s internal apps for days, and hinted at an angry letter from a senator. It’s funny. (Anyway, Facebook responded.)

Perhaps realizing that this particular claim of ignorance was a moment (and perhaps in response to some screening off-screen action at the CEO’s branch-worthy virtual testimony headquarters), Zuckerberg took the opportunity to back pedal a few minutes later:

In response to Congressman Johnson’s question, before I say I wasn’t familiar with the Facebook Research app when I wasn’t familiar with the name. I just want to make it clear that I remember we used an app for research and it has been shut down ever since.

Of course, although Zuckerberg may not be sure about the name for sure, it would not be assumed that he was unaware of the events at the time, as they were both for Facebook. They were very popular and expensive. Naturally, he too would have been refreshed during the preparation of this testimony.

It is possible that Zuckerberg is not familiar with the exact wording of Apple’s rules, but it was no secret that the rules were changed primarily in response to reports from Facebook’s Ono Schneigens. Here is what Apple said at the time:

We work hard to protect user privacy and data security in the Apple ecosystem. With the latest update to our guidelines, we have made it clear that apps should not collect information about any other apps installed on the user’s device for informational or advertising / marketing purposes and It must specify how user data will be collected and how it will be used.

Later, when Tech Glass revealed that Facebook was using the Enterprise Deployment Tool primarily to sideline spyware on teen phones, Apple said:

We’ve designed our enterprise developer program entirely for the internal distribution of apps in an organization. Facebook has been using its subscription to distribute data collection apps to users, in clear violation of its agreement with Apple. Any developers who use their Enterprise Certificate to distribute apps to users will have their Certificates revoked, which we did in this case to protect our users and their data.

So Facebook was the first, then obviously, reason for this app store lockdown. Representative Johnson made the point at the end of his question.

Johnson: You tried to do something and then you got caught, sorry, then you did it again. [long pause]* Isn’t that true?

ZuckerbergCongressman, I respectfully disagree with this feature.

You can watch the entire hearing here:





Source link

Leave a Reply

Close Menu