Facebook sues operator of Instagram clone sites – TechCrunch

Facebook sues operator of Instagram clone sites – TechCrunch

Facebook today filed another lawsuit against a company for violating its terms of service. In this case, the company has sued Ansar Sahintak, a Turkish citizen who ran a network of Instagram clone sites. Facebook says Sahantak used automation software to delete public profiles, photos and videos of Instagram users of more than 100,000 accounts without permission and then publish the data on their website’s network. Happened

In the filing, Facebook says it became aware of the clone website network a year ago, in November 2019. It turned out that the defendant controlled several domains, many of which were similar to Instagram, including Jollygram.com, MGGram. com, imggram.net, finalgram.com, pikdo.net and ingram.ws. The first on this list, jolygram.com, has been in use since August 2017. Other networks have registered in the years since the spread. Finalgram.com was the latest to be used and has been in operation since October 2019.

In the case of Facebook visitors, it does not say how large these sites were, but described TechClunch’s clone network as having “multiple traffic.”

In addition to Facebook’s claims of trademark infringement of these domains, these sites were populated with data that was pulled from Instagram’s website by automated scraping – that is, exclusive Through software that pretends to be human instead of boot for accessing data.

The complaint states that the defendant was able to block Instagram’s security measures against such automated tools as requests from Facebook’s servers came from requests from someone using the official Instagram app. ۔

The defendant created and used thousands of fake Instagram accounts to program his scraping software, which would mimic the steps that real, legitimate users of the Instagram app can take. Facebook says the number of fake accounts used daily can be very high. For example, on April 17, 2020, defendant used more than 7,700 accounts on Facebook servers for automated requests. On April 22, 2020, it used more than 9,000.

On cloned websites, users were able to log in to any Instagram username and then view their public profiles, photos, videos, stories, hashtags and location. Clone sites also allowed visitors to download photos and videos posted on Instagram, a feature that Instagram does not offer directly. (Its official website and app does not offer a “save” button.)

Facebook sought to prevent violations of these various terms of service in 2019, when it disabled nearly 30,000 fake Instagram accounts operated by defendants. It sent a series of unanimous letters and shut down more Instagram and Facebook accounts, including the defendant’s Facebook page. However, the defendant claimed that jygram.com did not work, it was only registered in his name. But he also said he had shut it down.

Facebook claims to have pped 25,000 in its efforts to resolve the issues and resources used to investigate the defendant’s actions and is asking for damages to be determined during the trial. Is.

The lawsuit is one of the many cases filed by Facebook in the years following the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where millions of Facebook users’ data was cut off without their consent. Facebook has since sued analytics firms that misused its data, violating the terms of selling fake “favorites” to its developers and other marketing intelligence operations. Filed However, the company tells TechCrunch that this is the first Instagram lawsuit against the clone websites.

Facebook V ENSAR SAHINTURK via TechCrunch on Scribd

Source link

Leave a Reply

Close Menu